{
  "id": 12025031,
  "name": "Rammie Earl HALL v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hall v. State",
  "decision_date": "1996-12-09",
  "docket_number": "CR 95-166",
  "first_page": "823",
  "last_page": "823",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "326 Ark. 823"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "933 S.W.2d 363"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "115 S.Ct. 2310",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "S. Ct.",
      "case_ids": [
        1564227
      ],
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/515/0506-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 720,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.811,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0206346430880657e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5451321679372041
    },
    "sha256": "727dcd7947c7bc28799d89efedc77826ef45416fc69016831cf670959f86951d",
    "simhash": "1:d9ea52d21e288ff4",
    "word_count": 117
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:12:03.555215+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rammie Earl HALL v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nHall petitions for rehearing and cites U.S. v. Gaudin, _ U.S. _, 115 S.Ct. 2310 (1995), for the proposition that our decision improperly failed to entertain the jury-instruction issue raised herein as a structural error. We deny Hall\u2019s petition by pointing out that Gaudin does not hold that an erroneous jury instruction which omits an element of the government\u2019s burden of proof compels a finding of prejudicial error. See also California v. Roy, _ U.S. _, (No. 95-2025, Nov. 4, 1996).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Vada Berger, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rammie Earl HALL v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 95-166\n933 S.W.2d 363\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 9, 1996\nAppellant, pro se.\nWinston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Vada Berger, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0823-01",
  "first_page_order": 825,
  "last_page_order": 825
}