{
  "id": 12025465,
  "name": "Rogelio and Basilio REYES v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rogelio v. State",
  "decision_date": "1996-12-16",
  "docket_number": "CR 96-1385",
  "first_page": "913",
  "last_page": "913",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "326 Ark. 913"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "934 S.W.2d 526"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "711 S.W.2d 162",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1875396,
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0384-01",
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "289 Ark. 382",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1230,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.829,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.8651142789705816e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8418272648328146
    },
    "sha256": "f3acf0190f2c2e217facf172882de0002a13afc9a7d820368f5c3b5aeb8dab15",
    "simhash": "1:385eecf7688ecdb9",
    "word_count": 220
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:12:03.555215+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rogelio and Basilio REYES v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nBasilio and Rogelio Reyes, by their attorney, have filed a motion for rule on the clerk.\nThe motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellants.\nThis court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See, e.g., Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). Here, the attorney does not admit fault on his part. We have held that a statement that it was someone else\u2019s fault or no one\u2019s fault will not suffice. Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, appellants\u2019 motion must be denied.\nIf the appellants\u2019 attorney will file a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript within thirty days from the date of this per curiam, the motion will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nThe present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Travis & Borland, BA., by: Thomas L. Travis, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rogelio and Basilio REYES v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 96-1385\n934 S.W.2d 526\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 16, 1996\nTravis & Borland, BA., by: Thomas L. Travis, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0913-01",
  "first_page_order": 915,
  "last_page_order": 915
}