{
  "id": 922832,
  "name": "O.C. WILLINGHAM v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Willingham v. State",
  "decision_date": "1997-03-17",
  "docket_number": "CR 96-1222",
  "first_page": "682",
  "last_page": "683",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "327 Ark. 682"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "939 S.W.2d 311"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 731,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.743,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.032541279433665825
    },
    "sha256": "58911680ca54632b323b9efa9e1e2ba70e53613c9e7dc5afbde26c3020da6bfe",
    "simhash": "1:134a48f4ad2e7a2c",
    "word_count": 127
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:50:41.435320+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "O.C. WILLINGHAM v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, O.C. Willingham, by his attorney, Charles L. Honey, has filed an amended motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to an error on his part.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles L. Honey, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "O.C. WILLINGHAM v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 96-1222\n939 S.W.2d 311\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 17, 1997\nCharles L. Honey, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0682-01",
  "first_page_order": 716,
  "last_page_order": 717
}