{
  "id": 50409,
  "name": "Timothy MOSES v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moses v. State",
  "decision_date": "1997-04-07",
  "docket_number": "CR 96-680",
  "first_page": "103",
  "last_page": "104",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 Ark. 103"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "940 S.W.2d 496"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 759,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.753,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.00155646139987312
    },
    "sha256": "c7a2d3b6daf8ecbea19b1e717baad2905f0e72b48998438156751c82aafed59a",
    "simhash": "1:33460d747c2edea9",
    "word_count": 129
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:26:32.867281+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Timothy MOSES v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Timothy Moses, by his attorney, Richard H. Young, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney \u201cexcepts full responsibility for the late filing.\u201d We assume he means he \u201caccepts\u201d responsibility for the error.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Richard H. Young, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Timothy MOSES v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 96-680\n940 S.W.2d 496\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 7, 1997\nRichard H. Young, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0103-01",
  "first_page_order": 129,
  "last_page_order": 130
}