{
  "id": 50412,
  "name": "Terrell Demond BAKER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Baker v. State",
  "decision_date": "1997-04-14",
  "docket_number": "CR 96-502",
  "first_page": "140",
  "last_page": "140",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 Ark. 140"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "941 S.W.2d 426"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "386 U.S. 738",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        6182629
      ],
      "year": 1967,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/386/0738-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1143,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.725,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0015566544613218763
    },
    "sha256": "62784fd3a1c185f2d091bf4052cd9c1245e2a227fcc2772c6a35280ed220ba58",
    "simhash": "1:c39d4316c2a96e88",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:26:32.867281+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Terrell Demond BAKER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Terrell Demond Baker was convicted of second-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, and theft of property and sentenced to an aggregate term of thirty-five years\u2019 imprisonment. His retained counsel, Tell Hulett, filed a brief contending that the appeal is without merit. The State has filed a motion asking that we direct appellant to comply with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4 \u2014 3(j) (1), which requires that a no-merit brief contain an argument section that consists of a list of all rulings adverse to the appellant made by the trial court on all objections, motions and requests made by either party, along with an explanation as to why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal. See also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).\nSince the filing of appellant\u2019s brief, Mr. Hulett is now deceased. We deny the State\u2019s motion at this time, and grant the appellant a period of thirty days in which to obtain new counsel.\nMotion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Tell Hulett, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Terrell Demond BAKER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 96-502\n941 S.W.2d 426\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 14, 1997\nTell Hulett, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0140-01",
  "first_page_order": 166,
  "last_page_order": 166
}