#### Dan Chris IVY v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-835

949 S.W.2d 892

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 11, 1997

No response.

Winston Bryant, Att’y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Asst. Att’y Gen., and Vada Berger, Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

In granting the State’s motion to release the transcript, we refer to our per curiam order of March 19, 1997, in Ivy v. State, 327 Ark. 683, 939 S.W.2d 843 (1997), in which we denied Mr. Ivy’s request to unseal the records, but allowed references to be made to them in a Rule 37 petition that we required to be submitted under seal. The State is also bound by this procedure and should be allowed access to the transcript of the hearing for the purposes of preparing its brief, subject to the provision of our March 19 order that the records and references to *496them not be released to anyone other than the Court, the parties to this appeal, and the parties’ attorneys.