{
  "id": 236227,
  "name": "Patricia Louise FINCH v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Finch v. State",
  "decision_date": "1997-06-30",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-306",
  "first_page": "319",
  "last_page": "320",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "329 Ark. 319"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "947 S.W.2d 11"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "322 Ark. 114",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1447502
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1995,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/322/0114-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1142,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.688,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5991268216795651
    },
    "sha256": "734f9d77e1129c08e4a48f827fe3d8e0a0c97a1969bdbe054d86ca29971f4cb6",
    "simhash": "1:422440bf44f8dca4",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:12.305718+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patricia Louise FINCH v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Patricia Louise Finch, filed a motion to supplement the record in the above case. Appellant has filed a partial transcript, but seeks to supplement the record with affidavits of the deputy prosecuting attorney and appellant\u2019s attorney. Appellant states that these affidavits show that a motion to exclude the attorney, whose assistance was at issue in the Rule 37 hearing, from court during appellant\u2019s testimony was made in chambers; and appellant\u2019s attorney concedes error in his affidavit regarding the failure to renew this motion for the record when the hearing began.\nWe remand the matter back to the trial court to settle the record in accordance with Ark. R. App. P. \u2014 Civ. 6(d), made applicable to criminal proceedings pursuant to Ark. R. App. P.\u2014 Crim. 5(a). West v. State, 322 Ark. 114, 907 S.W.2d 133 (1995) (per curiam). We direct that the record, as settled, be filed with this court\u2019s clerk within thirty-five days.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jim Clark Law Firm, by: Jim Clark, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patricia Louise FINCH v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-306\n947 S.W.2d 11\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered June 30, 1997\nJim Clark Law Firm, by: Jim Clark, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0319-01",
  "first_page_order": 343,
  "last_page_order": 344
}