{
  "id": 298601,
  "name": "Larry Darnell INGRAM v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ingram v. State",
  "decision_date": "1997-10-09",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-1114",
  "first_page": "218",
  "last_page": "219",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "330 Ark. 218"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "951 S.W.2d 314"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "264 Ark. 561",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1668966
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1978,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0561-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1390,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.738,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5994046371043253
    },
    "sha256": "09a8e06284fac39589ded43647a29463f9237211003fa3fa20a5748a8ff5a1d4",
    "simhash": "1:6217cd756316f4ab",
    "word_count": 236
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:54.141445+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Larry Darnell INGRAM v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellant, Larry Darnell Ingram, has filed a motion for belated appeal. His attorney, D. Kirk Joyce, a deputy public defender, states that appellant\u2019s case has been delayed due to recent turnover of attorneys at the Washington County Public Defender\u2019s Office. He explains further that he was assigned appellant\u2019s case after Kent McLemore, another deputy, resigned from the office. According to Mr. Joyce, while the notice of appeal and designation of record was timely filed in appellant\u2019s case, the court reporter did not receive notice to begin transcribing the record. No extensions were sought, and the deadline for filing the record was August 21, 1997. The record was tendered for filing on September 11, 1997.\nBecause counsel does not admit fault for failing to file the record in a timely manner, we must deny the motion. If the attorney will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not timely filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be treated as one for rule on the clerk and will be granted. Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978). The attorney is given thirty days from issuance of this per curiam order to respond.\nMotion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. Kirk Joyce, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Larry Darnell INGRAM v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-1114\n951 S.W.2d 314\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 9, 1997\nD. Kirk Joyce, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0218-01",
  "first_page_order": 246,
  "last_page_order": 247
}