{
  "id": 298656,
  "name": "Dennis Cornell TUCKER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tucker v. State",
  "decision_date": "1997-10-30",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-1213",
  "first_page": "434",
  "last_page": "434",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "330 Ark. 434"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "952 S.W.2d 677"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 754,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.694,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.011904168930312153
    },
    "sha256": "8c7da3fe0b5f4ae1c17d9969f682595efca4de889c86cc6a57ceae5952625d43",
    "simhash": "1:3a4754f5bd2f5e2d",
    "word_count": 131
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:54.141445+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dennis Cornell TUCKER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Dennis Cornell Tucker, by his attorney, G.B.\u201cBing\u201d Colvin, III, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the transcript was tendered late due to an error on his part.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. B. \u201cBing\" Colvin, III, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Dennis Cornell TUCKER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-1213\n952 S.W.2d 677\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 30, 1997\nG. B. \u201cBing\" Colvin, III, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0434-01",
  "first_page_order": 472,
  "last_page_order": 472
}