{
  "id": 1604777,
  "name": "Benfordene Butler SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-02-19",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-1190",
  "first_page": "536",
  "last_page": "536",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "331 Ark. 536"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "959 S.W.2d 54"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 96,
    "char_count": 1014,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.75,
    "sha256": "c8146092e07ddc48679f28f0fc21ffa3279deae1c62111da7dfe2baf650f4669",
    "simhash": "1:5a1258346c126439",
    "word_count": 162
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:04:18.346145+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Benfordene Butler SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Benfordene Butler Smith, by her attorney, Willard Proctor, Jr., has filed a motion to extend time for filing brief.\nAppellant\u2019s brief was due on November 15, 1997. Appellant\u2019s attorney admits that the brief has not been filed in a timely manner due to an error on his part. Specifically, appellant\u2019s attorney failed to maintain the briefing schedule on his calendar. Furthermore, appellant\u2019s motion to extend time for filing brief was not filed until January 14, 1998, after the Supreme Court Clerk sent a letter to appellant\u2019s attorney regarding the status of briefing.\nThe motion to file belated brief is granted.\nWe routinely grant motions to file belated briefs. However, because of the long delay by appellant\u2019s attorney, a copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Willard Proctor, Jr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Benfordene Butler SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-1190\n959 S.W.2d 54\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 19, 1998\nWillard Proctor, Jr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0536-01",
  "first_page_order": 560,
  "last_page_order": 560
}