{
  "id": 377627,
  "name": "Jerry Chris JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-03-05",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-1306",
  "first_page": "182",
  "last_page": "183",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "332 Ark. 182"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "964 S.W.2d 199"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "327 Ark. 375",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        922593
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/327/0375-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1541,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.709,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.4033266686372354e-08,
      "percentile": 0.33795348686351984
    },
    "sha256": "597733bbab1164a69d3bef833c97e55d8e47f4070df9217baf277a926e63b01d",
    "simhash": "1:51e86472e66d70a6",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:26:57.770497+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jerry Chris JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Jerry Chris Johnson has filed an appeal from an order of the trial court denying his Rule 37 petition. His brief was filed on December 29, 1997, and the State, as appellee, filed its brief on January 26, 1998. Johnson, prior to filing his reply brief, has filed this motion to supplement the record and for an extension of time to file his reply brief.\nAccording to his motion, Johnson requests that this court allow him to supplement the record on this appeal \u201cwith the abstract of his previous appeal.\u201d We construe his request to be for permission to supplement the record in the instant case with the record of the underlying trial.\nThe motion is moot in that it is not necessary for an appellant in a postconviction appeal to request that the record be supplemented with the trial transcript. The transcript of a trial which has been lodged in the appellate court on direct appeal of the judgment is a public record. As such, it need not be incorporated into the record in a postconviction appeal which stems from the same judgment of conviction. Drymon v. State, 327 Ark. 375, 938 S.W.2d 825 (1997). As it will be necessary for Johnson\u2019s counsel to abstract the record of the previous appeal, however, rebriefing should occur so that Johnson can file his original brief with an abstract which includes an abstract of the trial record.\nMotion moot.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James Wyatt, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jerry Chris JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-1306\n964 S.W.2d 199\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 5, 1998\nJames Wyatt, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0182-01",
  "first_page_order": 206,
  "last_page_order": 207
}