{
  "id": 377656,
  "name": "Ben Wesley HICKS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hicks v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-04-16",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-353",
  "first_page": "616",
  "last_page": "616",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "332 Ark. 616"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "962 S.W.2d 813"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 867,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.717,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.688403287882615e-08,
      "percentile": 0.012754835571332784
    },
    "sha256": "27caa400fedf7eb89fcd26899717fe9068c64567af846c41977af4961dad21b5",
    "simhash": "1:2b425376a831f926",
    "word_count": 149
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:26:57.770497+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ben Wesley HICKS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Ben Wesley Hicks, by his attorneys, Tapp Law Offices, by Tamra Barrett, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 37. His attorney admits that the record of the postconviction proceedings was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Tamra Barrett, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ben Wesley HICKS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-353\n962 S.W.2d 813\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 16, 1998\nTamra Barrett, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0616-01",
  "first_page_order": 642,
  "last_page_order": 642
}