{
  "id": 703828,
  "name": "Larry DONIHOO v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Donihoo v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-05-21",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-766",
  "first_page": "340",
  "last_page": "341",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 Ark. 340"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "968 S.W.2d 626"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1323,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.715,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7488813054351817
    },
    "sha256": "e7d6d28cec75c40358d064e01b12e58766373476ae1d28754974cb04369c671a",
    "simhash": "1:891a3ee84da4a38e",
    "word_count": 236
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:30:04.030411+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Corbin, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Larry DONIHOO v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Larry Donihoo\u2019s petition for Rule 37 relief was denied on March 11, 1997, and he filed a notice of appeal from that denial on March 31, 1997. Donihoo\u2019s counsel, Charles A. Potter, sent a transcript of the case which was received by this court\u2019s clerk on July 9, 1997, but counsel failed to file his brief which was due on August 18, 1997. As a consequence, the State filed its motion to dismiss on March 23, 1998, which we granted on April 16, 1998. On April 24, 1998, Donihoo\u2019s counsel, Mr. Potter, moved to set aside our order dismissing the appeal, and in doing so, he conceded it was his responsibility to file a timely brief, but he faded to do so, which caused the dismissal. On May 13, 1998, Donihoo filed a pro se motion asking us to reinstate his appeal.\nWe grant Donihoo\u2019s and his counsel\u2019s motions, but because Mr. Potter without explanation has delayed nearly nine months in filing a brief, causing dismissal of Donihoo\u2019s appeal, we order Mr. Potter to appear before this court on the 4th day of June, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt.\nCorbin, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles A. Potter, for appellant.",
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Larry DONIHOO v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-766\n968 S.W.2d 626\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 21, 1998\nCharles A. Potter, for appellant.\nAppellant, pro se.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0340-01",
  "first_page_order": 370,
  "last_page_order": 371
}