{
  "id": 703826,
  "name": "Antonio AYERS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ayers v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-05-28",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-368",
  "first_page": "393",
  "last_page": "393",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 Ark. 393"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "968 S.W.2d 591"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "333 Ark. 116",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        703834
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/333/0116-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1094,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.02568798412571544
    },
    "sha256": "2578e70db093def171bc0c5ed813a032a0751a672fe11cb9e4828a9fc684c80e",
    "simhash": "1:4cc74a917c0dd802",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:30:04.030411+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Antonio AYERS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAttorney R.S. McCullough, counsel for appellant Antonio Ayers, appeared for a hearing before this court on May 14, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for fading to file his client\u2019s brief on or before March 25, 1998, a final extension date, as previously ordered. Ayers v. State, 333 Ark. 116, 968 S.W.2d 591 (1998).\nDuring the hearing conducted on May 14, 1998, we accepted Mr. McCudough\u2019s gudty plea for fading to file his client\u2019s brief prior to the final extension date of March 25, 1998. Mr. McCullough has taken responsibility for his fadure to file the brief, but he has also submitted certain materials and statements in mitigation when making his plea.\nBased upon the foregoing, we hold that R.S. McCullough is in contempt for fading to file his client\u2019s brief in a timely manner, and we fine him $250.00. A copy of this opinion wid be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R.S. McCullough, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Antonio AYERS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-368\n968 S.W.2d 591\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 28, 1998\nR.S. McCullough, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0393-01",
  "first_page_order": 423,
  "last_page_order": 423
}