{
  "id": 703830,
  "name": "Larry DONIHOO v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Donihoo v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-06-11",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-766",
  "first_page": "577",
  "last_page": "578",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 Ark. 577"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "968 S.W.2d 62"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "968 S.W.2d 626",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        703851,
        703828
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/333/0342-01",
        "/ark/333/0340-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "333 Ark. 340",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        703828
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/333/0340-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1350,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.758,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.025688177187164193
    },
    "sha256": "8af522077380df14f8daefd7092655c08d8e2941d58d31090636895969c13624",
    "simhash": "1:40dc54f818eb789a",
    "word_count": 233
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:30:04.030411+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Corbin, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Larry DONIHOO v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAttorney Charles A. Potter, counsel for appellant Larry Donihoo, appeared for a hearing before this court on June 4, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file his client\u2019s brief on or before the due date of August 18, 1997. Donihoo v. State, 333 Ark. 340, 968 S.W.2d 626 (1998).\nDuring the hearing conducted on June 4, 1998, we accepted Mr. Potter\u2019s guilty plea for failing to file his client\u2019s brief. In sum, Mr. Potter failed to file appellant\u2019s brief that was due on August 18, 1997. Neither did he respond to the State\u2019s later motion to dismiss appellant\u2019s appeal because no brief had been filed. It was only after appellant\u2019s appeal had been dismissed that Mr. Potter sought reinstatement of appellant\u2019s appeal and requested time to file a brief. We have granted reinstatement of appellant\u2019s appeal and have set a date of June 30, 1998, for the filing of appellant\u2019s brief.\nWe hold Mr. Potter is in contempt of this court\u2019s directives for failing to file the appellant\u2019s brief in a timely manner, and fine him $250.00. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nCorbin, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles A. Potter, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Larry DONIHOO v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-766\n968 S.W.2d 62\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered June 11, 1998\nCharles A. Potter, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0577-01",
  "first_page_order": 607,
  "last_page_order": 608
}