{
  "id": 703762,
  "name": "Freddie Davis MATTHEWS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Matthews v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-06-11",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-436",
  "first_page": "578",
  "last_page": "580",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 Ark. 578"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "970 S.W.2d 266"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "329 Ark. 363",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        236201
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/329/0363-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "325 Ark. 27",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        369157
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1996,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "281"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/325/0027-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 194,
    "char_count": 2597,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.746,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.025687404941369167
    },
    "sha256": "b7f59c2cedea68e7a94982c6b70bfcbef670a0b08bbff17039a4c67cfe25c069",
    "simhash": "1:0b4b227d226fa9a8",
    "word_count": 441
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:30:04.030411+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Freddie Davis MATTHEWS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Freddie Davis Matthews was convicted of a Class-Y felony. Appellant filed in the trial court a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37. On February 9, 1998, the trial court denied appellant\u2019s petition. Appellant filed a notice of appeal and designation of record on February 24, preserving his right to appeal the denial of his petition. Also on February 24, appellant\u2019s counsel, Rick Woods, filed a motion for leave to withdraw appearance as counsel, which the trial court granted on March 3. Mr. Woods forwarded to appellant a notice of filing of appeal and the transcript from the Rule 37 hearing on April 20.\nNow Mr. Woods has filed in this court a motion for leave to withdraw appearance as counsel on behalf of his client in order to refieve him from representation due to the fact that Mr. Woods has a jury trial on June 1 and 2 that prevent him from adequately representing appellant in this appeal. We find this reason insufficient cause for granting this motion to withdraw as counsel.\nRule 16 of our Criminal Rules of Appellate Procedure provides as follows:\nTrial counsel, whether retained or court appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the trial court or the Arkansas Supreme Court to withdraw in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause.\nArk. R. App. P.\u2014Criminal 16 (1998); see also Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(j)(1) (1998); Jackson v. State, 325 Ark. 27, 923 S.W.2d 280 (1996). Rule 16 applies to appeals of orders denying post-conviction relief as well. Sanders v. State, 329 Ark. 363, 952 S.W.2d 133 (1997). Once a notice of appeal is filed with the circuit clerk, only the appeals court may relieve counsel of the obligation to proceed with the appeal. Jackson, 325 at 28, 923 S.W.2d at 281.\nMr. Woods requests permission to withdraw from representing appellant due to a conflict, a jury trial on another client\u2019s felony charge that was scheduled for June 1-2, 1998. Mr. Woods contends that his preparation for this trial would render him unable to effectively assist appellant in bringing this appeal. We do not find this sufficient cause to relieve him of his responsibility now that the appeal has been filed.\nThe present motion for leave to withdraw appearance as counsel is denied. An appropriate briefing schedule shall be set by the clerk of this court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rick Woods, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Freddie Davis MATTHEWS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-436\n970 S.W.2d 266\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered June 11, 1998\nRick Woods, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0578-01",
  "first_page_order": 608,
  "last_page_order": 610
}