{
  "id": 1655467,
  "name": "Daryl VAUGHN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vaughn v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-07-09",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-741",
  "first_page": "211",
  "last_page": "212",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "334 Ark. 211"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "970 S.W.2d 816"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "264 Ark. 561",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1668966
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1978,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0561-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 1019,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.746,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06246445256074775
    },
    "sha256": "6fd229fb58bbbdb93a7e9862466b74b75a334579064a13e32f0d9854d7e2a6ef",
    "simhash": "1:3a5a1415698e48b0",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:18.632081+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Daryl VAUGHN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Daryl Vaughn, by his attorney, J. Leon Johnson, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the Appellant.\nThis court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See, e.g., Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986) (per curiam). Here, the attorney admits that the record was filed one day late, and that he was in error in failing to file the record on time.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nMotion granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Leon Johnson, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Daryl VAUGHN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-741\n970 S.W.2d 816\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered July 9, 1998\nJ. Leon Johnson, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0211-01",
  "first_page_order": 237,
  "last_page_order": 238
}