{
  "id": 1655505,
  "name": "Dennis SUBLETT v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sublett v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-09-18",
  "docket_number": "CR 97-49",
  "first_page": "329",
  "last_page": "330",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "334 Ark. 329"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "973 S.W.2d 823"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "969 S.W.2d 666",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1655491,
        1655479
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/334/0226-01",
        "/ark/334/0223-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "334 Ark. 226",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1655491
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/334/0226-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 975,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.756,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.062465610929440286
    },
    "sha256": "41de64740cbfe66f0bf05e020ba29200bfc4859c735ca7ec90a57a1059470394",
    "simhash": "1:638e7cb97482d242",
    "word_count": 169
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:18.632081+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dennis SUBLETT v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe procedural background in this matter is set forth in our per curiam opinion delivered on July 16, 1998. Sublett v. State, 334 Ark. 226, 969 S.W.2d 666 (1998). Attorney Kenneth G. Fuchs, counsel for appellant Dennis Sublett, was ordered to appear before this court on September 10, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to file Mr. Sublett\u2019s brief in a timely manner. Mr. Fuchs appeared on that date, entered a plea of guilty to the contempt citation, and accepted full responsibility for fading to file the appellant\u2019s brief.\nBased on the foregoing, we hold that Mr. Fuchs is in contempt for failing to file Mr. Sublett\u2019s brief in a timely manner, and we fine him $250.00. A copy of this order will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kenneth G. Fuchs, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Dennis SUBLETT v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 97-49\n973 S.W.2d 823\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 18, 1998\nKenneth G. Fuchs, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0329-01",
  "first_page_order": 355,
  "last_page_order": 356
}