{
  "id": 1655510,
  "name": "Eric DAVIS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davis v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-10-01",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-1135",
  "first_page": "427",
  "last_page": "428",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "334 Ark. 427"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "975 S.W.2d 97"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "711 S.W.2d 162",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1875396,
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0384-01",
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "289 Ark. 382",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1242,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.744,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5196250823889732
    },
    "sha256": "3dedb1703de1031c3a55126c1eed70b6edd18b44e543f234c045601f623daed6",
    "simhash": "1:3a5cecf7098eddba",
    "word_count": 223
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:18.632081+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Eric DAVIS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nEric Davis, by his attorney, C. Richard Lippard, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.\nThe motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the Appellant.\nThis court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See, e.g., Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). Here, the attorney does not admit fault on his part. We have held that a statement that it was someone else\u2019s fault or no one\u2019s fault will not suffice. See Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, Appellant\u2019s motion must be denied.\nAppellant\u2019s attorney, C. Richard Lippard, shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript, and upon filing same, the motion will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nThe present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. Richard Lippard, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Eric DAVIS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-1135\n975 S.W.2d 97\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 1, 1998\nC. Richard Lippard, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0427-01",
  "first_page_order": 453,
  "last_page_order": 454
}