{
  "id": 1655495,
  "name": "Clarence WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Williams v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-10-15",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-597",
  "first_page": "559",
  "last_page": "560",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "334 Ark. 559"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "975 S.W.2d 828"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1495,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.748,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3342168581885638e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6142108672152
    },
    "sha256": "671c1caaa236aed8f8fccb0bd6911152776e99ee75b41ff0b0dc4d70faf841f5",
    "simhash": "1:814e016451d0fdab",
    "word_count": 261
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:18.632081+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Clarence WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per. Curiam.\nThe State of Arkansas, as appellee, moves this court to dismiss the appeal of appellant Clarence Williams. The State shows this court that Williams\u2019s brief was due on August 29, 1998, and Williams tendered his brief to the Clerk of the Supreme Court on August 19, 1998. The brief, however, was rejected for failure to have it in the right format. No corrected appellant\u2019s brief has been filed, and that is the catalyst for the State\u2019s motion. The response of Williams\u2019s counsel, Dana R. Davis, is that travel and a full criminal practice have caused the delay in correcting the brief.\nDana R. Davis, on behalf of Williams, also moves the court to allow the filing of a belated brief. Counsel maintains that no opportunity has been afforded to file a belated brief, and a \u201creasonable time\u201d to do so is requested.\nWe begin with the observation that it strikes us as implausible that counsel would not immediately file a corrected brief irrespective of whether he or she was told he could do so. The State\u2019s motion to dismiss is denied. Williams\u2019s motion to file a belated brief is granted. That brief must be filed within fifteen days from the date of this order. A copy of this per curiam order shall be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per. Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dana R. Davis, for appellant.",
      "Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Vada Berger, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Clarence WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-597\n975 S.W.2d 828\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 15, 1998\nDana R. Davis, for appellant.\nWinston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Vada Berger, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0559-01",
  "first_page_order": 585,
  "last_page_order": 586
}