{
  "id": 862768,
  "name": "William Avon NEAL v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Neal v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-11-19",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-1318",
  "first_page": "259",
  "last_page": "259",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "335 Ark. 259"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "979 S.W.2d 93"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "295 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 977,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.781,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.03040659899476765
    },
    "sha256": "157d5837ab0bf0bede12ba11d395ed94721ae93e6532c9889d79f4058df64211",
    "simhash": "1:216a48252933dee5",
    "word_count": 172
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:04.221219+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Avon NEAL v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, William Avon Neal, by his attorney, John L. Kearney, has filed a motion for belated appeal. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nBecause appellant\u2019s attorney admitted fault and his motion was proper under Ark. R. App. P. \u2014 Crim. 2, the motion to file belated appeal was granted, and the per curiam was treated as a motion for rule on the clerk.\nA copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John L. Kearny, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Avon NEAL v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-1318\n979 S.W.2d 93\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 19, 1998\nJohn L. Kearny, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0259-01",
  "first_page_order": 281,
  "last_page_order": 281
}