{
  "id": 862767,
  "name": "Stacey Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. State",
  "decision_date": "1998-12-03",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-743",
  "first_page": "333",
  "last_page": "333",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "335 Ark. 333"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "982 S.W.2d 669"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1303,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.781,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.088059399933835e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9380187802454892
    },
    "sha256": "6ec0261492632b38b992980d9a843f1786422868fac7bddbf87e80f339bccc11",
    "simhash": "1:49025931e7b874bb",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:04.221219+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Stacey Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Stacey Eugene Johnson has filed a motion for access to sealed records. We granted Appellant\u2019s motion for writ of certiorari to settle the record on September 10, 1998. The writ was returned on October 12, 1998, and the supplemental record was filed at that time. Included in the supplemental record are sealed psychotherapy records of a child witness that were received in camera during Appellant\u2019s trial. The trial court denied Appellant access to those records below.\nAppellant now requests access to those records to review them for their possible bearing on the issues he raises on appeal. We grant the motion and order that both Appellant and the State be provided access to the sealed records, and that immediately thereafter, the records shall be resealed. To protect the patient\u2019s privacy, we direct that both Appellant\u2019s and the State\u2019s abstracts and briefs be submitted to this court under seal, with only the State being permitted to access Appellant\u2019s briefs and only the Appellant being permitted to access the State\u2019s brief. Additionally, we direct the Clerk to set a new briefing schedule.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David Lewis Clark, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Stacey Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-743\n982 S.W.2d 669\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 3, 1998\nDavid Lewis Clark, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0333-01",
  "first_page_order": 355,
  "last_page_order": 355
}