{
  "id": 51246,
  "name": "STATE of Arkansas v. Robert A. ROBBINS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Robbins",
  "decision_date": "1999-02-11",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-1394",
  "first_page": "377",
  "last_page": "378",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "336 Ark. 377"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "985 S.W.2d 296"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "335 Ark. 380",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        862805
      ],
      "weight": 4,
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/335/0380-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 159,
    "char_count": 2486,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.79,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.5644786724048038e-07,
      "percentile": 0.677476756366877
    },
    "sha256": "3e40747696131da1a6d83bff5fafd67f010e39de2ac4475a692c283ec903a366",
    "simhash": "1:c9335628f65fde6a",
    "word_count": 426
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:29:35.905877+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of Arkansas v. Robert A. ROBBINS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nBy per curiam order entered on December 11, 11, 1998, this court affirmed the trial court\u2019s finding that Respondent Robert A. Robbins knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal his capital murder conviction and death sentence. State v. Robbins, 335 Ark. 380, 985 S.W.2d 293 (1998). We directed the trial court to conduct a hearing pursuant to Rule 37.5 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure within twenty-one days of the mandate. Id. We also directed the trial court to issue findings and to return the court\u2019s transcript and findings to this court for final review. Id.\nThe trial court conducted the hearing pursuant to Rule 37.5 on December 17, 1998, and issued its findings on December 17, 1998. The transcript of the hearing, included the trial court\u2019s findings, was filed with this court on December 21, 1998. On December 22, 1998, the State filed a motion for review and a motion to dissolve stay of execution. We granted the State\u2019s motions on January 14, 1999, and issued the mandate on the same day.\nThe State has now filed a motion for clarification on January 21, 1999, in which it seeks clarification with regard to this court\u2019s order entered on January 14, 1999. Specifically, the State wants to know whether additional findings will be entered by this court before the State seeks an execution date. In accordance with our December 11, 1998, per curiam order, and in response to the State\u2019s motion for review and motion to dissolve stay of execution filed on December 22, 1998, this court made its final review of the trial court\u2019s transcript and findings before it granted the State\u2019s motions on January 14, 1999. To the extent that there may be any question about what we meant when we granted the State\u2019s motions on January 14, 1999, the trial court\u2019s findings have been fully and finally reviewed by this court and the stay of execution was dissolved upon issuance of the mandate on January 14, 1999. When we granted the State\u2019s motion for review and motion to dissolve stay of execution on January 14, 1999, we implicitly upheld the trial' court\u2019s finding that Mr. Robbins knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appointment of an attorney under Rule 37.5.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Todd L. Newton, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., and Kelly K. Hill, Deputy Att\u2019y Gen., for appellant.",
      "Val P. Price, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE of Arkansas v. Robert A. ROBBINS\nCR 98-1394\n985 S.W.2d 296\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 11, 1999\nMark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Todd L. Newton, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., and Kelly K. Hill, Deputy Att\u2019y Gen., for appellant.\nVal P. Price, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0377-01",
  "first_page_order": 403,
  "last_page_order": 404
}