{
  "id": 51321,
  "name": "Rickey Lee DILLARD v. The Honorable Tom KEITH, Judge",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dillard v. Keith",
  "decision_date": "1999-03-04",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-1424",
  "first_page": "521",
  "last_page": "522",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "336 Ark. 521"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "986 S.W.2d 100"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "325 Ark. 318",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        369276
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/325/0318-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1252,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.732,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7482158226213188
    },
    "sha256": "aa0078cc67abb3a1c2837afc722edaebe9ad7a6fd8ae64579ae0b73509e60ad4",
    "simhash": "1:470e9e36c6a5c134",
    "word_count": 212
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:29:35.905877+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rickey Lee DILLARD v. The Honorable Tom KEITH, Judge"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPetitioner Rickey Lee Dillard tendered to this this court a petition for writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, for writ of prohibition contending that the Honorable Tom Keith, Circuit Judge, had failed to act within a reasonable time on a motion for speedy trial filed in the Circuit Court of Benton County. He subsequently filed the instant motion seeking to file the mandamus action without the certified record required by our clerk to file such a petition.\nThe motion is denied. Our Rule 6-1 (a) provides that in cases in which the jurisdiction of the court is in fact appellate although in form original, such as petitions for writs of prohibition, certiorari, or mandamus, the pleadings with certified exhibits from the trial court are treated as the record. Jackson v. Tucker, 325 Ark. 318, 927 S.W.2d 336 (1996). Without this certified record, there is no basis on which this court can assume jurisdiction of the matter. As a result, the motion for rule on clerk to file the mandamus petition without a record is dismissed.\nMotion for rule on clerk dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rickey Lee DILLARD v. The Honorable Tom KEITH, Judge\nCR 98-1424\n986 S.W.2d 100\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 4, 1999\nAppellant, pro se.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0521-01",
  "first_page_order": 547,
  "last_page_order": 548
}