{
  "id": 130673,
  "name": "James SLACK v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Slack v. State",
  "decision_date": "1999-10-21",
  "docket_number": "CR 99-809",
  "first_page": "65",
  "last_page": "65",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "339 Ark. 65"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "3 S.W.3d 291"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 Ark. 561",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1668966
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1978,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0561-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "959 S.W.2d 54",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        377584,
        1604777,
        377628
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/332/0078-01",
        "/ark/331/0536-01",
        "/ark/332/0076-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "332 Ark. 78",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        377584
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/332/0078-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "338 Ark. 643",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        243417
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1999,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/338/0643-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1142,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.792,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.00455682937499445
    },
    "sha256": "9929998e82524377d5b44a2abbe094f647881c8854f40f0befbaf670d71778cb",
    "simhash": "1:f30e4f77452beaee",
    "word_count": 192
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:09.164159+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James SLACK v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAppellant James Slack filed a motion for IAM. appeal. We previously denied the motion because Appellant\u2019s attorney, Kenneth G. Fuchs, did not admit fault in failing to file a timely notice of appeal. See Slack v. State, 338 Ark. 643, 999 S.W.2d 668 (1999)(per curiam). We indicated, however, that we would grant the motion if Appellant\u2019s attorney filed an affidavit accepting full responsibility for failing to file a timely notice of appeal. Appellant\u2019s attorney has assumed full responsibility for the error in an affidavit filed October 8, 1999.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Johnson v. State, 332 Ark. 78, 959 S.W.2d 54 (1998) (per curiam); Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978). A copy of this per curiam opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kenneth G. Fuchs, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James SLACK v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 99-809\n3 S.W.3d 291\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 21, 1999\nKenneth G. Fuchs, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0065-01",
  "first_page_order": 87,
  "last_page_order": 87
}