{
  "id": 1875669,
  "name": "Hodgkin vs. Holland, Sheriff",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hodgkin v. Holland",
  "decision_date": "1879-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "203",
  "last_page": "204",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "34 Ark. 203"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "4 Munf., 380",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Munf.",
      "case_ids": [
        4442905
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/va/18/0176-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 Hen. & M., 398",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Hen. & M.",
      "case_ids": [
        6726796
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/va/12/0467-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "1 Stew., 479",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Stew.",
      "case_ids": [
        8495433
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/stew/1/0479-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 Dana, 464",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Dana",
      "case_ids": [
        5546336
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ky/32/0464-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 Litt., 287",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Litt.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1128,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.459,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06892274414454279
    },
    "sha256": "d54524fff888e8ef7a8efe084ffb64cbed543122c8bc0cdda04378cffe6ab53e",
    "simhash": "1:468a1aa205c3dc7f",
    "word_count": 206
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:09:16.201435+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hodgkin vs. Holland, Sheriff."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Harrison, J.\nThis appeal is from an order of the court below approving the bond of Samuel J. Holland as sheriff, against objections filed by appellant.\nThe only objection in this case, not made in the case of Hodgkin v. Holland, collector, etc., ante, was, that the names of the sureties were not inserted in the body of the bond.\nIt was not necessary to the validity of the bond that the names of the sureties should be mentioned in the body of it-\n2 Par. on Con., 512; Dobson v. Keys, Cro. Jac., 261; Bruce v. Colgan, 2 Litt., 287; Blakey v. Blakey, 2 Dana, 464 ; Martin v. Dortch, 1 Stew., 479; Bartley v. Yates, 2 Hen. & M., 398; Beale v. Wilson, 4 Munf., 380.\nIt is sufficient in any contract, if the intent of the party to be bound clearly appears.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Harrison, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Valentine, for appellant.",
      "Rose, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hodgkin vs. Holland, Sheriff.\n1. Sheriff\u2019s Bone: Names of sureties in.\nIt is not necessary that the names of the sureties appear in the body of a sheriff\u2019s bond. It is sufficient in any contract, if the intent of the party to be bound clearly appears.\nAPPEAL from Chicot Circuit Court.\nlion. T. E. Sorrells, Circuit Judge.\nValentine, for appellant.\nRose, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0203-01",
  "first_page_order": 203,
  "last_page_order": 204
}