{
  "id": 1875731,
  "name": "The State vs. Martin",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Martin",
  "decision_date": "1879-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "340",
  "last_page": "341",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "34 Ark. 340"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1761,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.376,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.2354304628118416e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8679695225474535
    },
    "sha256": "ef5863c166c5405823ec69d85aec37676d1f9fb811cef950f11eeab7d1140eb3",
    "simhash": "1:9e85c467d9d8810c",
    "word_count": 294
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:09:16.201435+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The State vs. Martin."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Harrison, J.\nThe appellee was indicted in the Independence circuit court for selling liquor by wholesale, without having paid the special state and county taxes required of him as a liquor dealer.\nThe charge in the indictment tvas as follows: \u201c The said Edward Martin, on the twentieth day of October, A. D. 1878, in the county and state aforesaid, did unlawfully sell to one Gilbert Malone one quart of alcohol without paying the special tax by law levied.\u201d\nThe defendant demurred to the indictment upon the ground that the facts charged did not constitute a public offense. The court sustained the demurrer, and dismissed the indictment.\nIt was not charged that the defendant was a liquor dealer, and such special taxes were required only of liquor dealers, by the statute in force when the indictment was found.\nAlcohol is not either ardent or vinous spirits, \u00a9r liquor of any kind, and its sale is not in any manner restricted or attempted to be regulated.\nThe indictment was defective, also, in not stating the particular special tax, whether the state or county, that had not been paid.\nThe demurrer was properly sustained.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Harrison, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henderson, Attorney General, for the State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The State vs. Martin.\n1. Criminal Pleading: Indictment for Selling Liquor. Alcohol is not liquor.\nAn indictment for selling liquor without paying the special tax prescribed by secs. 5052 or 5054, Gantts Digest, must charge that the defendant was \u00a1i liquor dealer, and must state the particular tax, whether state or county, that had not been paid.\n2. Alcohol is neither ardent or vinous spirits, or liquor of any kind; and its sale is not in any manner restricted or attempted to be regulated.\nAPPEAL from Independence Circuit Court.\nHon. R. H. Powell, Circuit Judge.\nHenderson, Attorney General, for the State."
  },
  "file_name": "0340-01",
  "first_page_order": 342,
  "last_page_order": 343
}