{
  "id": 1365241,
  "name": "James BILYEU v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bilyeu v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-02-17",
  "docket_number": "CR 98-1480",
  "first_page": "417",
  "last_page": "417",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "340 Ark. 417"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "10 S.W.3d 105"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "336 Ark. 367",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        51316
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1999,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/336/0367-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1293,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.765,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05139006173719008
    },
    "sha256": "8b7260a2f942877451dda60bd86c64a10251770500d09d331091fbe171d27965",
    "simhash": "1:63f030008a113b28",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:52:11.293742+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James BILYEU v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Robert L. Brown, Justice,\nconcurring. I agree to grant the State\u2019s motion for permission to file belated brief. I am troubled, however, by the five-month gap between the filing of appellant\u2019s brief on August 16, 1999, and the tender of the State\u2019s brief on January 24, 2000, especially since the appellant apparently is in prison. The State did not receive a copy of the appellant\u2019s brief after it was filed. But the State, no doubt, did receive a copy of the briefing schedule from the Supreme Court Clerk, showing that the appellant\u2019s brief was due in August 1999. This should have alerted the State to determine whether the appellant\u2019s brief had indeed been filed. Had the State checked, this considerable delay in moving ahead on this appeal could have been avoided.\nThis is a Rule 37 appeal, and in order to file a Rule 37 petition, a petitioner must be in custody. See Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1; Bohanan v. State, 336 Ark. 367, 985 S.W.2d 708 (1999).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Robert L. Brown, Justice,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hurst Law Offices, by: Q. Byrum Hurst, Jr., for appellant.",
      "Mark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: O. Milton Fine II, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James BILYEU v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 98-1480\n10 S.W.3d 105\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nMotion for Permission to File Belated Brief granted February 17, 2000\nConcurring opinion delivered February 17, 2000\nHurst Law Offices, by: Q. Byrum Hurst, Jr., for appellant.\nMark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: O. Milton Fine II, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0417-01",
  "first_page_order": 455,
  "last_page_order": 455
}