{
  "id": 1365245,
  "name": "Jimmy EASLEY; Vickey Wagner Easley v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Easley v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-02-24",
  "docket_number": "CR 00-144",
  "first_page": "473",
  "last_page": "474",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "340 Ark. 473"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "10 S.W.3d 462"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "711 S.W.2d 162",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1875396,
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0384-01",
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "289 Ark. 382",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1432,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.766,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05139083398298511
    },
    "sha256": "0a25c32b474272d51a725913431b1feb333a47cf051a8910ac991259738bb5ab",
    "simhash": "1:005ca5373c1fcd30",
    "word_count": 256
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:52:11.293742+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jimmy EASLEY; Vickey Wagner Easley v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJimmy Easley and Vickey Wagner Easley, by their attorney, have filed a motion for rule on the clerk.\nThe motion admits that the Easleys\u2019 record for appeal was not timely filed and asserts that this was due to a mistake on the part of the attorney, Winston C. Mathis, and the court reporter in failing to request an extension of time to file the record.\nThis court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See, e.g., Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). Here, the attorney does not admit fault on his part. We have held that a statement that it was someone else\u2019s fault or no one\u2019s fault will not suffice. Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, appellant\u2019s motion must be denied.\nIf the appellant\u2019s attorney files, within thirty days from the date of this per curiam, a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript, the motion for rule on the clerk will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nThe present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mathis & Dejanes, by: Winston C. Mathis, for appellants.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jimmy EASLEY; Vickey Wagner Easley v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 00-144\n10 S.W.3d 462\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 24, 2000\nMathis & Dejanes, by: Winston C. Mathis, for appellants.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0473-01",
  "first_page_order": 511,
  "last_page_order": 512
}