{
  "id": 1365299,
  "name": "Sanford BUCHANAN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Buchanan v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-03-23",
  "docket_number": "CR 00-271",
  "first_page": "690",
  "last_page": "691",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "340 Ark. 690"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "12 S.W.3d 638"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "338 Ark. 29",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        243457
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1999,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/338/0029-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 981,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.756,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.051393536843267695
    },
    "sha256": "40029b4d2208db357c70cd10de6d87574f302c6ad072b854b59cf5d92fede2e0",
    "simhash": "1:7102b8766c2bdab8",
    "word_count": 169
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:52:11.293742+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sanford BUCHANAN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAppellant Sanford Buchanan, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The motion reflects that the record on appeal was due to be filed on March 1, 2000, but that it was not tendered until March 3, 2000. Appellant\u2019s attorney, Steve J. Jackson, admits responsibility for tendering the record late.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. Jones v. State, 338 Ark. 29, 992 S.W.2d 85 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986) (per curiam)).\nThe motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Steve J. Jackson, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sanford BUCHANAN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 00-271\n12 S.W.3d 638\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 23, 2000\nSteve J. Jackson, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0690-01",
  "first_page_order": 728,
  "last_page_order": 729
}