{
  "id": 1257711,
  "name": "Dianna SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-05-04",
  "docket_number": "CR 00-458",
  "first_page": "252",
  "last_page": "253",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "341 Ark. 252"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "15 S.W.3d 344"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "338 Ark. 29",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        243457
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1999,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/338/0029-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1735,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.755,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.46990075483165233
    },
    "sha256": "04ae473d7c5306f460b8503a172430b59fa5bbed1e245ed1fe0446187d53d9fc",
    "simhash": "1:385ebfb672abdba0",
    "word_count": 303
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:03:19.609022+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dianna SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAppellant Dianna Smith, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The record reflects that the judgment and commitment order was filed on September 10, 1999, and a notice of appeal was filed on October 7. An amended order was filed on October 19, followed by an amended notice of appeal-filed on October 28. An order extending the time to lodge the record on appeal was entered on January 13, 2000, more than ninety days after the first notice of appeal was filed. The transcript was not tendered until April 7.\nPursuant to Ark. R. App. P.- \u2014 Crim. 5(a), the record on appeal must be tendered within ninety days from the filing of the first notice of appeal. Rule 5(b) provides that the trial court may order an extension of time to file .the record, but the order must be entered before the expiration of the ninety-day period provided in subsection (a). Thus, the order for extension in this case was untimely.\nAppellant\u2019s attorney, G.B. \u201cBing\u201d Colvin III, admits responsibility for negligently miscalculating the time to file the record on appeal. We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. Jones v. State, 338 Ark. 29, 992 S.W.2d 85 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986) (per curiam)).\nThe motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G.B. \u201cBing\u201d Colvin, III, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Dianna SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 00-458\n15 S.W.3d 344\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 4, 2000\nG.B. \u201cBing\u201d Colvin, III, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0252-01",
  "first_page_order": 278,
  "last_page_order": 279
}