{
  "id": 1257740,
  "name": "Daniel W. JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-06-01",
  "docket_number": "CR 00-476",
  "first_page": "523",
  "last_page": "523",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "341 Ark. 523"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "17 S.W.3d 499"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 915,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.782,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3918373233342948
    },
    "sha256": "130ec617be350881eceda8b0e5aea3047e1e12746df03461b9ecac8027280290",
    "simhash": "1:738358a25708ff31",
    "word_count": 149
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:03:19.609022+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Daniel W. JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\n[1] Appellant Danny W Johnson has filed a petition AM. review pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2 and 2-4, stating that he is entitled to a review because the Arkansas Court of Appeals erroneously affirmed appellant\u2019s second-degree murder conviction for noncompliance with our abstracting requirements. We have determined that review is proper on the issue of whether appellant\u2019s conviction was properly affirmed for noncompliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2. Because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2, we grant review on this question only.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "The James Law Firm, by: Steven R. McNeely and William O. \u201cBill\u201d James, Jr., for appellant.",
      "Mark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: C. Joseph Cordi, Jr., Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Daniel W. JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 00-476\n17 S.W.3d 499\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered June 1, 2000\nThe James Law Firm, by: Steven R. McNeely and William O. \u201cBill\u201d James, Jr., for appellant.\nMark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: C. Joseph Cordi, Jr., Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0523-01",
  "first_page_order": 549,
  "last_page_order": 549
}