{
  "id": 1342392,
  "name": "Alicen BECKHAM v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Beckham v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-09-07",
  "docket_number": "CR 00-901",
  "first_page": "2",
  "last_page": "2",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 Ark. 2"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "25 S.W.3d 412"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 81,
    "char_count": 706,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.759,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1995933875888662e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7627223075947277
    },
    "sha256": "de4d7d70890a9c219be4f17ade026e0e9e6fc7bee7946cb60ee68256d550821f",
    "simhash": "1:314a40746c33bc6d",
    "word_count": 123
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:01:02.266586+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Alicen BECKHAM v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAlicen Beckham, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.\nHer attorney, Robert A. Newcomb, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964, (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert A. Newcomb, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Alicen BECKHAM v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 00-901\n25 S.W.3d 412\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 7, 2000\nRobert A. Newcomb, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0002-01",
  "first_page_order": 26,
  "last_page_order": 26
}
