{
  "id": 1342442,
  "name": "James \"J.F.\" VALLEY v. The Honorable David BOGARD, Judge, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Valley v. Bogard",
  "decision_date": "2000-09-22",
  "docket_number": "00-539",
  "first_page": "124",
  "last_page": "126",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 Ark. 124"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "26 S.W.3d 584"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "342 Ark. 128",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1342348
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/342/0128-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "20 S.W.3d 271",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.3d",
      "case_ids": [
        1365243,
        1257783
      ],
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/340/0691-01",
        "/ark/341/0302-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "341 Ark. 302",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1257783
      ],
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/341/0302-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "341 Ark. 305",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1257771
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/341/0305-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 174,
    "char_count": 2228,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.761,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.050685773572127175
    },
    "sha256": "013e4161ab614e536b0f8c2cadc29256c53f7c993cdc29db138f7a65412f1948",
    "simhash": "1:6ce1788c52db5aca",
    "word_count": 381
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:01:02.266586+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "GLAZE, J., concurs; see Willis v. Circuit Court of Phillips County, 342 Ark. 128, 27 S.W.3d 372 (2000)."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "James \u201cJ.F.\u201d VALLEY v. The Honorable David BOGARD, Judge, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn May 4, 2000, the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Respondent Honorable Judge David Bogard presiding, ordered that Petitioner James \u201cJ.F.\u201d Valley shall not be certified as a candidate for the position of State Representative, District 99, in the Democrat primary election that was held on May 23, 2000. Judge Bogard also ordered that if the ballots for the election had already been printed, any votes cast for Valley shall not be counted.\nPrior to the primary election, Valley requested this court to expedite the appeal of Judge Bogard\u2019s order. This court denied that request, due to Valley\u2019s failure to make financial arrangements with the court reporter to secure a record in this matter. See Valley v. Bogard, 341 Ark. 305, 20 S.W.3d 272 (2000) (per curiam), and Valley v. Bogard, 341 Ark. 302, 20 S.W.3d 271 (2000) (per curiam). Valley again requests this court to expedite the appeal, and he asserts that financial arrangements have now been made to obtain the record on appeal. In his motion, Valley urges that the ballots in this matter are due to be printed shordy and that it is thus necessary to expedite this matter. Valley also seeks a stay of the contempt proceedings in the Pulaski County Circuit Court set for September 22, 2000.\nWe deny a stay of the contempt proceedings, but we grant the motion to expedite this matter. Accordingly, we issue a writ of certiorari to the court reporter, directing that the transcript of this matter be completed and submitted to this court on or before September 28, 2000. We further order that all the parties in this matter submit briefs to this court on or before October 3, 2000. No reply briefs are to be filed.\nIt is so ordered.\nGLAZE, J., concurs; see Willis v. Circuit Court of Phillips County, 342 Ark. 128, 27 S.W.3d 372 (2000).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wilson & Valley, by: E. Dion Wilson, for petitioner.",
      "Mark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Kelly Terry, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for respondent David Bogard.",
      "Mark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Warren Readnour, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for respondents Sharon Priest and State Board of Election Commissioners."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James \u201cJ.F.\u201d VALLEY v. The Honorable David BOGARD, Judge, et al.\n00-539\n26 S.W.3d 584\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 22, 2000\nWilson & Valley, by: E. Dion Wilson, for petitioner.\nMark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Kelly Terry, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for respondent David Bogard.\nMark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Warren Readnour, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for respondents Sharon Priest and State Board of Election Commissioners."
  },
  "file_name": "0124-01",
  "first_page_order": 148,
  "last_page_order": 150
}