{
  "id": 1342345,
  "name": "Ronald OWEN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Owen v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-11-02",
  "docket_number": "CR 00-820",
  "first_page": "542",
  "last_page": "542",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 Ark. 542"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "29 S.W.3d 365"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "342 Ark. 6",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1342359
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/342/0006-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 919,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.766,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05068384295763961
    },
    "sha256": "981cf494feef42252c67018970576431d8fbcc00df2278dcf00df3d58b986eff",
    "simhash": "1:bd221a053cb79a21",
    "word_count": 158
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:01:02.266586+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ronald OWEN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Ronald Owen, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. In Owen v. State, 342 Ark. 6, 26 S.W.3d 122 (2000), we denied appellant\u2019s motion, stating that upon receipt of an affidavit in which counsel accepted responsibility, the motion would be granted. His attorney, Randel Miller, states in his affidavit that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nTherefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Miller Law Firm, by: Randel Miller, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ronald OWEN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 00-820\n29 S.W.3d 365\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 2, 2000\nMiller Law Firm, by: Randel Miller, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0542-01",
  "first_page_order": 566,
  "last_page_order": 566
}