{
  "id": 1342426,
  "name": "Terrance ROBINSON and Tamagum Antonio Robinson v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Robinson v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-11-16",
  "docket_number": "CR 99-1112",
  "first_page": "711",
  "last_page": "711",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 Ark. 711"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "30 S.W.3d 109"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1036,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.719567370958748e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2957622239752202
    },
    "sha256": "f04d6642f0056c117240303f8c94178bd4b0cbbe240c09070131d26f0757ff31",
    "simhash": "1:3a124b164c93befc",
    "word_count": 176
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:01:02.266586+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Terrance ROBINSON and Tamagum Antonio Robinson v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellants Terrance Robinson and Tamagum Antonio Robinson, by and through their attorney, have filed a motion for belated appeal. This court held that the appeal was untimely due to a premature filing of a posttrial motion in Robinson v. State, 342 Ark. 711, 30 S.W.3d 109 (2000). Their attorney, Roy C. Lewellen, admits by motion and affidavit that the appeal was not timely filed due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lewellen & Associates, by: Roy C. Lewellen, for appellants.",
      "Mark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Terrance ROBINSON and Tamagum Antonio Robinson v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 99-1112\n30 S.W.3d 109\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 16, 2000\nLewellen & Associates, by: Roy C. Lewellen, for appellants.\nMark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0711-01",
  "first_page_order": 735,
  "last_page_order": 735
}