{
  "id": 226563,
  "name": "Senequa CHATT v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chatt v. State",
  "decision_date": "2000-12-07",
  "docket_number": "CR 00-1299",
  "first_page": "117",
  "last_page": "117",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "343 Ark. 117"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "31 S.W.3d 867"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "338 Ark. 29",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        243457
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1999,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/338/0029-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1099,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.788,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.00884955068809031
    },
    "sha256": "fa411a16818ba5cea75fd16e29ba6fc839397397aefba1860fc70bdfd923a422",
    "simhash": "1:73c6f2f56c0e7a29",
    "word_count": 189
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:43:01.373813+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Senequa CHATT v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per CURIAM.\nAppellant Senequa Chatt, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The partial transcript reflects that the notice of appeal was filed on August 3, 2000, and that the record on appeal was thus due to be filed on November 1, 2000. The record was not tendered with the Supreme Court Clerk until November 2, 2000. Appellant\u2019s attorney, S. Butler Bernard Jr., admits responsibility for tendering the record late.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. Jones v. State, 338 Ark. 29, 992 S.W.2d 85 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986) (per curiam)).\nThe motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "S. Butler Bernard, Jr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Senequa CHATT v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 00-1299\n31 S.W.3d 867\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 7, 2000\nS. Butler Bernard, Jr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0117-01",
  "first_page_order": 143,
  "last_page_order": 143
}