{
  "id": 210127,
  "name": "IN RE: Carl Fredrick MOYER",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Moyer",
  "decision_date": "2001-03-29",
  "docket_number": "01-14",
  "first_page": "350",
  "last_page": "351",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "344 Ark. 350"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "40 S.W.3d 314"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "340 Ark. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1365208
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/340/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "343 Ark. 768",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        226547
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2001,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/343/0768-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 161,
    "char_count": 1889,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.781,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5189128787045113
    },
    "sha256": "5ea968361540b22c36dbfd4c4f43e3fee07bca249b28441b0efe2eb108c004b0",
    "simhash": "1:72cc88694663c70a",
    "word_count": 324
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:48:00.616095+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE: Carl Fredrick MOYER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThis is an original action brought by the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct. The underlying facts of this case are set out in In Re: Moyer, 343 Ark. 768, 37 S.W.3d 618 (2001) (per curiam). In that opinion, we granted the Committee\u2019s petition and ordered Mr. Moyer to appear before this court on March 8, 2001, and show cause why he should not be held in contempt. Mr. Moyer subsequently notified the Supreme Court Clerk of a scheduling conflict and asked for a continuance of the hearing. This court granted the continuance and instructed Mr. Moyer to appear on March 22, 2001.\nAttempts were made by the Arkansas State Police to serve Mr. Moyer with notice of the March 22 hearing, but they were unsuccessful. Apparently, Mr. Moyer had moved from his last-known address and had disconnected his telephone. Because Mr. Moyer was not properly served with notice of the last hearing, we hereby issue a new order that he appear before this court at 9:00 a.m., on April 5, 2001, for consideration of the relief requested by the Committee, including why he should not be held in contempt.\nPursuant to Section 5E(1) of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law, the attorney\u2019s mailing address on record with this court\u2019s clerk constitutes the address for service by mail. See Hogue v. Neal, 340 Ark. 250, 12 S.W.3d 186 (2000) (per curiam). It is the attorney\u2019s responsibility to inform the clerk\u2019s office, in writing and within a reasonable time, of any change of address. Id. We thus direct that service be attempted by mail, pursuant to Section 5E(2)(a), to Mr. Moyer\u2019s mailing address that is on record with this court\u2019s clerk.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lynn Williams, for petitioner.",
      "Carl Fredrick Moyer, pro se."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE: Carl Fredrick MOYER\n01-14\n40 S.W.3d 314\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 29, 2001\nLynn Williams, for petitioner.\nCarl Fredrick Moyer, pro se."
  },
  "file_name": "0350-01",
  "first_page_order": 380,
  "last_page_order": 381
}