{
  "id": 1111315,
  "name": "Benjamin C. DUKE v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Duke v. State",
  "decision_date": "2001-09-27",
  "docket_number": "CR 01-967",
  "first_page": "159",
  "last_page": "159",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "346 Ark. 159"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "55 S.W.3d 756"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "39 S.W.3d 798",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.3d",
      "case_ids": [
        210144,
        210133
      ],
      "year": 2001,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/344/0406-01",
        "/ark/344/0419-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "344 Ark. 405",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        210176
      ],
      "year": 2001,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/344/0405-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 854,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.778,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.04042185471044837
    },
    "sha256": "1618c451d69ff4808756e41814fa2cec9627646232e8955557f4fc71dca7dd38",
    "simhash": "1:b1534064553379ad",
    "word_count": 147
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:24:55.385284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Benjamin C. DUKE v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Benjamin C. Duke, by and through his attorney, Bryan Christian, has filed a motion to file a belated appeal. His attorney accepts responsibility for the untimeliness in filing a notice of appeal and states in his motion that the notice of appeal was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam); Jacks v. State, 344 Ark. 405, 39 S.W.3d 798 (2001).\nAppellant\u2019s motion is granted. A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bryan B Christian, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Benjamin C. DUKE v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 01-967\n55 S.W.3d 756\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 27, 2001\nBryan B Christian, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0159-01",
  "first_page_order": 189,
  "last_page_order": 189
}