{
  "id": 683299,
  "name": "James Dennis HUDSPETH; Johnny \"Red\" Hudspeth v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hudspeth v. State",
  "decision_date": "2001-12-13",
  "docket_number": "CR 01-1222",
  "first_page": "298",
  "last_page": "298",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 Ark. 298"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "61 S.W.3d 842"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1080,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.746,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1995933875888662e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7610518254659747
    },
    "sha256": "7270e8d44ed82252d46853df4c2633ab061d888d686f1f4c9529f0ab24fcef69",
    "simhash": "1:b65f4a639c93fe6d",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:00:47.549724+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "\u00cdMBER, J\u201e not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "James Dennis HUDSPETH; Johnny \u201cRed\u201d Hudspeth v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "P IBR Curiam.\nAppellants James Dennis Hudspeth and Johnny \u201cRed\u201d Hudspeth, by and through their attorney, have filed a motion for rule on clerk. Appellants\u2019 attorney, David P. Henry, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to an illness he suffered, which he maintains constitutes excusable neglect and unavoidable casualty, thereby entitling appellants to have the record filed and the case docketed by the Clerk.\nWe find that the attendant circumstances do not constitute excusable neglect or unavoidable casualty; however, as the error is admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, we find good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals In Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\n\u00cdMBER, J\u201e not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "P IBR Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David P. Henry, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Dennis HUDSPETH; Johnny \u201cRed\u201d Hudspeth v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 01-1222\n61 S.W.3d 842\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 13, 2001\nDavid P. Henry, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0298-01",
  "first_page_order": 328,
  "last_page_order": 328
}