{
  "id": 683229,
  "name": "Lee Charles LEWIS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lewis v. State",
  "decision_date": "2002-01-17",
  "docket_number": "CR 01-1327",
  "first_page": "438",
  "last_page": "438",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 Ark. 438"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "64 S.W.3d 753"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "711 S.W.2d 162",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1875396,
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0384-01",
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "289 Ark. 382",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1247,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.747,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.5916105598991863e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8181386250704191
    },
    "sha256": "b4197712b68022ac1c1febdac4fcee47ed8aa71d366f5f571d9d474ed183358f",
    "simhash": "1:385c64b6188ecdb0",
    "word_count": 225
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:00:47.549724+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lee Charles LEWIS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "P ER CURIAM.\nLee Charles Lewis, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant\u2019s counsel but rather was due to unforeseen casualty.\nThis court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See, e.g., Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). Here, the attorney does not admit fault on his part. We have held that a statement that it was someone else\u2019s fault or no one\u2019s fault will not suffice. Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, appellant\u2019s motion must be denied.\nIf the appellant\u2019s attorney shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript, the motion will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nThe present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "P ER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John F. Gibson, Jr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lee Charles LEWIS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 01-1327\n64 S.W.3d 753\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 17, 2002\nJohn F. Gibson, Jr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0438-01",
  "first_page_order": 468,
  "last_page_order": 468
}