{
  "id": 683328,
  "name": "Terrance ROBINSON and Tamagum Antonio Robinson v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Robinson v. State",
  "decision_date": "2002-01-31",
  "docket_number": "CR 01-351",
  "first_page": "513",
  "last_page": "514",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 Ark. 513"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "64 S.W.3d 754"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "347 Ark. 231",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        683309
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2001,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/347/0231-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "57 S.W.3d 162",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.3d",
      "case_ids": [
        1111384,
        1111335
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2001,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/346/0266-01",
        "/ark/346/0265-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "346 Ark. 266",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1111384
      ],
      "year": 2001,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/346/0266-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 2064,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.766,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.024700860938224583
    },
    "sha256": "c105057eb7f184276f88304cb29f62d0179090c317504e33622159d1eb38c283",
    "simhash": "1:0e0b34843645e42f",
    "word_count": 339
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:00:47.549724+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Terrance ROBINSON and Tamagum Antonio Robinson v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "P ER CURIAM.\nOn October 11, 2001, this court issued a per curiam directing the Supreme Court Clerk to accept a substituted copy of the trial transcript in this matter when all of the attorneys of record certify to the Clerk by affidavit that the trial transcript is true, accurate, and complete. Robinson v. State, 346 Ark. 266, 57 S.W.3d 162 (2001) (per curiam). We further directed the attorneys of record to reconstruct the record in the appeal, including trial exhibits, and certify in the same affidavit that the full record with the transcript and exhibits was accurate and complete. Id.\nOn October 26, 2001, attorney for the appellants filed a \u201cCertification\u201d and stated that the trial transcript was complete but that the thirteen trial exhibits are \u201cpresumed lost.\u201d On November 7, 2001, the deputy prosecuting attorney filed an affidavit approving the trial transcript and stating in part: \u201cIf requested, I will attempt to reconstruct the trial exhibits.\u201d\nOn December 6, 2001, we again directed counsel of record to reconstruct the trial exhibits, as they appeared pertinent to this appeal, and certify the same to this court by affidavit. We stated that this must be done within thirty days from the date of this per curiam. Robinson v. State, 347 Ark. 231, 60 S.W.3d 484 (2001) (per curiam).\nOn January 3, 2002, the deputy prosecuting attorney, Fred Thorne, filed his affidavit with a packet of reconstructed exhibits with this court. To date, defense counsel, Roy Lewellen, has again failed to comply with this court\u2019s order concerning reconstruction of the exhibits for purposes of his clients\u2019 appeal.\nWe order Mr. Lewellen to appear before this court at 9:00 a.m. on February 14, 2002, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with this court\u2019s order regarding certification of the reconstructed exhibits.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "P ER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Lewellen, for appellants.",
      "Fred Thorne, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Terrance ROBINSON and Tamagum Antonio Robinson v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 01-351\n64 S.W.3d 754\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 31, 2002\nRoy Lewellen, for appellants.\nFred Thorne, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0513-01",
  "first_page_order": 543,
  "last_page_order": 544
}