{
  "id": 74056,
  "name": "Timothy RAY v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ray v. State",
  "decision_date": "2002-04-18",
  "docket_number": "CR 02-317",
  "first_page": "304",
  "last_page": "305",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "348 Ark. 304"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "73 S.W.3d 594"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "330 Ark. 759",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        298600
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/330/0759-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "342 Ark. 709",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1342386
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "citing Muhammed v. State, 330 Ark. 759, 957 S.W.2d 692 (1997)"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "citing Muhammed v. State, 330 Ark. 759, 957 S.W.2d 692 (1997)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/342/0709-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 928,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.741,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.46868774974911664
    },
    "sha256": "52847abb947aedf613bbb6283cda7fe00b5e63e04946e51bc489f605134934c0",
    "simhash": "1:390e7a616027beff",
    "word_count": 164
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:20:10.754650+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Timothy RAY v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Timothy Ray, by and through his attorney, Herbert T. Wright, has filed a motion for belated appeal, which will be treated as a motion for rule on the clerk. See Johnson v. State, 342 Ark. 709, 30 S.W.3d 715 (2000) (citing Muhammed v. State, 330 Ark. 759, 957 S.W.2d 692 (1997)). Mr. Wright admits in the instant motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nAccordingly, we grant the motion for rule on the clerk. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wright & Vannoy, by: Herbert T. Wright, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Timothy RAY v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 02-317\n73 S.W.3d 594\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 18, 2002\nWright & Vannoy, by: Herbert T. Wright, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0304-01",
  "first_page_order": 324,
  "last_page_order": 325
}