{
  "id": 1513783,
  "name": "Robert Wayne GRADY v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Grady v. State",
  "decision_date": "2002-05-23",
  "docket_number": "CR 01-1061",
  "first_page": "44",
  "last_page": "44",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "349 Ark. 44"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "75 S.W.3d 707"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1222,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.755,
    "sha256": "0cdfe442ef76727f64d2689cbaddada8ff68782f544ce094f0828cba10e75159",
    "simhash": "1:4d9f58b18cc3e29a",
    "word_count": 213
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:02.317850+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robert Wayne GRADY v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAttorney Scott Adams, counsel for appel- lant Robert Grady, appeared before this court on May 16, 2002, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for fading to file his client\u2019s brief on' or before April 11, 2002, a final extension date, as previously ordered.\nDuring the hearing conducted on May 16, 2002, we accepted Mr. Adams\u2019s guilty plea for failing to file his client\u2019s brief prior to the final extension date. Mr. Adams has taken responsibdity for his fadure to file the brief, and has submitted statements in mitigation of his actions when making his plea.\nBased upon the foregoing, we accept Mr. Adams\u2019s guilty plea for failing to file his client\u2019s brief in a timely manner, and we fine him $250.00. We also note that Mr. Adams made a commitment to this court to have his client\u2019s brief filed with the clerk of this court within seven days from the entry of this opinion. Any failure to fulfdl this obligation will result in further proceedings. A copy of this opinion wid be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Scott Adams, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert Wayne GRADY v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 01-1061\n75 S.W.3d 707\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 23, 2002\nScott Adams, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0044-01",
  "first_page_order": 64,
  "last_page_order": 64
}