{
  "id": 1404541,
  "name": "Antonio Dewayne WALKER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Walker v. State",
  "decision_date": "2002-10-03",
  "docket_number": "CR 02-955",
  "first_page": "267",
  "last_page": "267",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "350 Ark. 267"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "85 S.W.3d 919"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 999,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.675,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.448908389950584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39073887005539326
    },
    "sha256": "b599a08f2f62fc03bc9bee1648f7a63ccaf4c67311b64b3e7f166500d9ca5f57",
    "simhash": "1:313a16f4e817d87b",
    "word_count": 178
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:36:54.106154+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Antonio Dewayne WALKER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAntonio DeWayne Walker, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert L. Scull, admits in his motion that the record was tendered more than seven months beyond date of the original judgment due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nThe notice of appeal was not filed before entry of the original judgment. Thus, the notice of appeal would not be treated as filed on the day after judgment is entered pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. \u2014 Crim. 2(b)(l)(2002).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert L. Scull, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Antonio Dewayne WALKER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 02-955\n85 S.W.3d 919\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 3, 2002\nRobert L. Scull, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0267-01",
  "first_page_order": 291,
  "last_page_order": 291
}