{
  "id": 1158931,
  "name": "Harmon WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Williams v. State",
  "decision_date": "2002-11-21",
  "docket_number": "CR 02-1075",
  "first_page": "214",
  "last_page": "214",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 Ark. 214"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "89 S.W.3d 933"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1129,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.7,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5991117628865621
    },
    "sha256": "cbc6224f8bc4a3af3b84d47d01c115f3b7c40aa6b9717ba5e26d0fbe42f99596",
    "simhash": "1:3312ea794897ca69",
    "word_count": 196
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:20:47.503009+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harmon WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Harmon Williams, by and through his attorney, David Mark Gunter, has filed a motion for rule on clerk to lodge the record in this appeal. Because the record was tendered later than the seven months from the date of judgment, we treat his motion as one for a belated appeal. See Ark. R. App. P. \u2014 Crim. 4; Ark. R. App. P. \u2014 Civ. 5. Attorney Gunter states in the motion that he accepts full responsibility for tendering the record beyond the seven-month period for filing. He further admits that he should have filed a partial record and moved for an extension of time before the seven months from date of judgment rah.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David Mark Gunter, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harmon WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 02-1075\n89 S.W.3d 933\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 21, 2002\nDavid Mark Gunter, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0214-01",
  "first_page_order": 240,
  "last_page_order": 240
}