{
  "id": 1155497,
  "name": "William B. FINAGIN; Gloria L. Finagin; S.G. Leoffler, Jr.; Grace H. Leoffler; Severine G. Leoffler, III; and Dorothy L. Leoffler v. ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority",
  "decision_date": "2003-05-22",
  "docket_number": "02-1197",
  "first_page": "356",
  "last_page": "357",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 Ark. 356"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "107 S.W.3d 174"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1267,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.731,
    "sha256": "4a5335618e121652884d4fe79f82f8334cdba200f6623ca63fdd08cfb1a3dfa6",
    "simhash": "1:0f92621c12be06a5",
    "word_count": 202
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:12:52.629354+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Corbin, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "William B. FINAGIN; Gloria L. Finagin; S.G. Leoffler, Jr.; Grace H. Leoffler; Severine G. Leoffler, III; and Dorothy L. Leoffler v. ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellants, William B. Finagin and Gloria Finagin et al., by and through their attorneys, John P. Gill and Richard L. Lawrence, have filed a motion to supplement their abstract, which we will treat as a motion for substituted brief, and for a stay of the time required to file their reply brief. We grant appellants\u2019 motions.\nPursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(l) (2003) of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court, we hereby grant.appellants fifteen days within which to file a substituted abstract, Addendum, and brief. As appellee has already filed its brief, appellee will then be afforded fifteen additional days, after appellants have filed their substituted abstract, Addendum, and brief, to revise or supplement its brief, at the expense of appellants\u2019 counsel. Appellants will then be afforded five days to file their reply brief.\nMotions granted.\nCorbin, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A., by: John P. Gill and Richard L. Lawrence, for appellants.",
      "David L. Beatty, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William B. FINAGIN; Gloria L. Finagin; S.G. Leoffler, Jr.; Grace H. Leoffler; Severine G. Leoffler, III; and Dorothy L. Leoffler v. ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY\n02-1197\n107 S.W.3d 174\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 22, 2003\nGill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A., by: John P. Gill and Richard L. Lawrence, for appellants.\nDavid L. Beatty, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0356-01",
  "first_page_order": 380,
  "last_page_order": 381
}