{
  "id": 36077,
  "name": "Linda DAVIS and Dennis Wood v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davis v. State",
  "decision_date": "2004-10-16",
  "docket_number": "CR 03-375",
  "first_page": "475",
  "last_page": "476",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 Ark. 475"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "123 S.W.3d 909"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "354 Ark. 345",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        36086
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/354/0345-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1326,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.806,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0010687881803147596
    },
    "sha256": "9bba4668a74e02b191a85c8e591c520b9cfe95297172e6b329844cb41c629b1d",
    "simhash": "1:09fa08f9364cd61c",
    "word_count": 217
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:05:30.600361+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Linda DAVIS and Dennis Wood v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellants Linda Davis and Dennis Wood appeal from their convictions for drug-related offenses. Both were sentenced to 126 months\u2019 imprisonment for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, with intent to deliver, followed by five years\u2019 suspended imposition of sentence. Both entered conditional pleas of guilty in which they reserved the right to appeal the denial of their motion to suppress evidence under Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b). They assert that the search and seizure of items from their residence pursuant to a search warrant was based on an illegal search of their garbage container and, therefore, the items seized should have been suppressed.\nBecause the facts and arguments are similar, if not identical, to those presented in our recent case of Rikard v. State, 354 Ark. 345, 123 S.W.3d 114 (2003), we find it unnecessary to repeat what was said in that case. Accordingly, we adopt and incorporate herein by reference the reasoning set forth in Rikard, and affirm the trial court\u2019s denial of appellants\u2019 motion to suppress based on that decision.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stuart Vess, for appellant.",
      "Mike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Brent P. Gasper, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Linda DAVIS and Dennis Wood v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 03-375\n123 S.W.3d 909\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 16, 2004\nStuart Vess, for appellant.\nMike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Brent P. Gasper, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0475-01",
  "first_page_order": 501,
  "last_page_order": 502
}