{
  "id": 2649415,
  "name": "James LUMPKIN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lumpkin v. State",
  "decision_date": "2004-01-29",
  "docket_number": "CR 04-39",
  "first_page": "677",
  "last_page": "678",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 Ark. 677"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "144 S.W.3d 281"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 698,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.747,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1995933875888662e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7641942621667359
    },
    "sha256": "9a8ab31eec7ab6202e561693c0a45695044eae160ab687dd17af180f60732127",
    "simhash": "1:31125a302c33dc21",
    "word_count": 121
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:11:14.990404+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James LUMPKIN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant James Lumpkin, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Don Etherly, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Don Etherly, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James LUMPKIN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 04-39\n144 S.W.3d 281\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 29, 2004\nDon Etherly, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0677-01",
  "first_page_order": 701,
  "last_page_order": 702
}