{
  "id": 5367431,
  "name": "Donald STROM v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Strom v. State",
  "decision_date": "2004-02-19",
  "docket_number": "CR 03-743",
  "first_page": "224",
  "last_page": "224",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 Ark. 224"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "147 S.W.3d 689"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1050,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.772,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.779640312470347e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9307687436603447
    },
    "sha256": "722e9e608d536fcc8aa021402fa1c37fc449b8dfa4d52c1dd8640f5622de2ec7",
    "simhash": "1:a15261f4bcaf5caf",
    "word_count": 178
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:43:53.781338+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Donald STROM v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Donald Strom, by his attorney, Kathy Hall, has filed a motion to file a belated brief on his Rule 37 claim. The record was timely lodged in this case and briefing was commenced on June 27, 2003. Appellant\u2019s brief was originally due on August 6, 2003. Appellant\u2019s counsel asked for and was granted two 60-day extensions, making the brief due on December 4, 2003. \u25a0Appellant\u2019s brief was tendered on February 6, 2004.\nIn the pending motion, Ms. Hall accepts full responsibility for having failed to timely file the appellant\u2019s brief. We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nA copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kathy Hall, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Donald STROM v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 03-743\n147 S.W.3d 689\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 19, 2004\nKathy Hall, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0224-01",
  "first_page_order": 246,
  "last_page_order": 246
}